Citizens for scientific > _rapports2parties

Table of contents by logical order CLICK HERE

 

WHAT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE TWO PARTS OF THE SITE?

Site map:
The site is organised in three Parts:

  Introductory video to the essential experiment
Complementary videos (how to enhance the revolutionary capabilities)

 

Might we attempt to establish a few links between the proposed software and the content of the book?

Using my computer model (my software), I sought to elicit a conception of the world that would give credibility to my way of working towards change and dreaming about a desirable future for human society. . It is therefore not very surprising if I see possible connections between these two parts of my activity.

Those of my softwares that play the role of metaphor illustrating various possible or wished aspects of society are (as developed in the tables below): " generalist software "," software 3 "," Conference 4 "," software 3 levels of organization and two emergences .

But also " capitalist exploitation "," class struggle "," sustainable development "...

October 2003: the matter of the connections between the two parts of the Website Takes a new turn with "Software Module 3". See the table below and software 3

September 2007: Softwares E4 and E5 are Software interested in the outcoming of the "ideas guide" of human societies. See the table below. And Conference 4

February 2010: Software "3 levels and 2emergences" addresses the question of the coupled development of individuals and society. See the table below.
And software 3 levels of organization and two emergences

Multi-Agent Programming

in the general software proposed
in a self-managing society
.All of the laws (rules, instructions) that define how an agent works are in that agent. These laws are called "initial" laws. They are relatively simple. Self-managing activists and citizens act upon the initiative of social workings. They are socially educated and capable.
- The laws of the population of agents result from the interactions among agents. They are not deduced mechanically from the initial laws. They are called "emerging efficient laws". They are statistical and relatively difficult to describe.

- They cannot be deduced mathematically from the initial laws (systems of differential equations that cannot be integrated)

- How a self-managing individual functions depends on how the other individuals function

- Social functioning is the consequence of the functioning of self-managing individuals.
"Emerging efficient rules"

Multi-agent systems are special, complex dynamic system

how the proposed general software works
how a self-managing society works
at once determinative and unpredictable at once determinative and unpredictable
progress not mechanical progress not mechanical
Sensitive to outside conditions (butterfly effect) individual initiative important
Ttwo levels: parts and whole Two levels: individuals and organizations
non-linear, with emergence - Non-linear, with emergence

- new concept of the revolutionary transition to a self-managing society


domain of operation

Under certain conditions (domain of operation) "optimization" of structures can occur
"Emerging efficient laws"
Under certain conditions, social progress can occur
"Emerging efficient rules"
self-organization of more and more efficient structures (= self-adaptation)
see here, for example, "three diagrams showing how the model works; a new scientific explanation is in sight "
"Emerging efficient laws"
creation of a self-managing society with statistical progress
"Emerging efficient rules"


Options of the proposed general software (see instruction manuals)

In The Software
in all societies
Mode of operation 1 Natural Laws
Mode of operation 2 (options "intelligence and solidarity") natural and cultural laws (human cultural heritage)
- The "intelligence" option alone multiplies the efficiency several times over.

- the same goes for the "solidarity" option

- The two options "intelligence" and "solidarity" are still more efficient when combined

- The solidarity option alone diminishes the efficiency
"Emerging efficient laws"

- Self-managing revolutionary individuals need good "cultural laws", that is, they need a good theory to match their practices

- it is up to them to construct their identity on the basis of their own experiences with social activism
"Emerging efficient rules"


With "Software Module 3"

in software module 3
in all societies
We are interested here in the entire population of large circles, associated in structures or "free" We are interested here in all human societies
The system is one of "controlled emergence. There are (unprogrammed) positive feedback loops that produce the emergence, and a programmed negative loop that controls the amplitude of this emergence

- One emerging efficient law
- Three simulated rules of control (homeostasis), non- emergent, non-experimental results

All human societies are "controlled-emergence" societies. There are (unprogrammed) positive feedback loops that produce the emergence, and a programmed negative loop that controls the amplitude of this emergence

emergence controlled by a search for optimum stability

The system implements "the three rules of responsibility"

"not to let oneself be modified by the world"

"to make changes in oneself based on the world"

"to modify the world according to one's own needs"

All human societies implement "the three rules of responsibility"

"not to let oneself be modified by the world"

"to make changes in oneself based on the world"

"to modify the world according to one's own needs"


With "Softwares E4 and E5"

in software E4 and E5
throughout society
We are interested here in large circles of two different species, and in emerging structures of large circles which exploit this difference Here we are interested in any human society, and in the different ideas that guide these societies in their functioning
E4 and E5 show how more efficient large circles help structures to become more efficient, and how more efficient structures favor more efficient large circles
"Emerging efficient laws"
The societies are made more efficient by "ideas-guide" on the long term, they promote these "ideas-guide" fot the long term
"Emerging efficient rules"
The more efficient large circles are preferentially selected by structures
"Emerging efficient laws"
Ideas-guide more efficient in the long term are preferentially retained by the societies
"Emerging efficient rules"
The emergence is implemented by two levels of organization We are interested here in the dialectical contradictions natural/cultural, long-term /short-term, objective/subjective, collective/individual ...
8 Software and software E4 are identical.. 8 software is classified in the "software" part of the site

software 8 allows to interpret the memorization needed for learning as carried by genes
Softwares 8 and E4 are identical. Software E4 is classified in the "books" part of the site.

Software E4 allows to interpret the memory needed for learning as driven by "ideas-guide"

Software E5 is a simple variation of E4, which could be used to illustrate the genes (part "software" of the site)

With "Software 3 levels of organization and two emergences, the first being an ingredient
of the second. A test of rational thought

software in 3 levels
throughout society
- On two screens that alternate we see one or other of two emergences

- One of these may represent the emergence of an individual who becomes a personality

- The other may represent the emergence of an organized society, which becomes organized, humanized

- One single large circle, the active ingredient of the second rise emergence corresponds to the whole

set of the first emergence : it allows to monitor interactions between an individual becoming a personality, and society in the process of humanization

- The mode coupling roundtrip between this great circle of the second source, and the first appearance as a whole, is explained in the record "three levels of organization ...". It is partly arbitrary, the idea being "as it is better or worse for one, it must be true for the other"

- The operating system shows that it is very possible, and even "thermodynamically normal"
Emerging Laws mutually efficient emergences appear between two consecutive emergences

- The Three Levels here are: Personality, Society, Humanity

- A "personality" is an "emerging" in the sense of "self-organizational development" in its natural and cultural world. The emergence is with an individual.

- Human society is an "emerging" in the sense of "self-organizational development" in its natural and cultural world. The emergence occurs with individuals who become public figures

- Relationship between personality and emerging-society-emergence: I postulate that it may be beneficial in both directions. The software should show why, how

Emerging rules mutually efficient emergences appear between individual and social emergences


I hope that the softwares could be useful to activists as to moralists. According to the concept of "metaphor" :

I state the laws science, I encourage the use of moral, legal rules. These rules, for me, are related more or less tightly to porting, explicitly or implicitly, with corresponding laws.

Whatever the connection between laws and rules which the researcher shall reach (and this connection is desirable in my opinion), there will never be identity between the two

It is impossible to get to know laws and rules, and their relationship over a short period of time.


February 2010: This page « what relationship... » sees its status in the site basically upgraded in order to avoid any possible confusion between the authority of scientific laws and the authority of moral rules

 



GENERAL TABLE OF CONTENTS CLICK HERE

This comprehensive Table of Contents was designed to facilitate your navigation on the site

_____________________________________________________


Elbeuf